I often get the question: How do I choose a pair of touring skis? The answer is as intricate as it is simple. Touring skis are incredibly complex, especially when you want them to perform on the uphill and downhill. Understandably, the cost of a pair makes choosing them even more daunting. Let me break it down for you. It all begins by answering the following question: What’s your playground? Where will your skis take you? Only then can you narrow it down to a selection derived from a series of key features. Here’s what I’m thinking. I’ll elaborate below on a logical step-by-step process that will help you choose a pair of touring skis.

Related: How To Choose Ski Touring Bindings: Clip-In & Ski

Pick Your Playground

Do you plan on skiing the powdery fields of Rogers Pass or the rock-hard snow of the Rockies? In the ever-expanding outdoor gear industry, manufacturers design skis to perform well in a narrow set of operating conditions. A ski that excels in powder snow will most likely perform poorly on ice. Likewise, a heavy “charger” ski designed for lift-accessed touring will be quite the burden when hauled up a 4000m peak. Here’s an example. A powder ski (such as the DPS Alchemist Lotus 124) has a specific set of design features that provide ample floatation and easy turn initiation in soft snow (i.e. wide waist, wide shovels, short effective edge, early rocker, and twin tips). Those features render the ski useless on packed snow or icy slopes.

Here’s a sad fact (for your wallet that is): there’s no single quiver-killer touring ski – the industry is getting damn close, but we’re not quite there yet. All skis have strengths and weaknesses. You have to pick one with which you can live with the drawbacks. You’ve got to ask yourself:

• Would I rather shell out the big bucks for an array of skis covering all snow conditions and burn a hole in my wallet?
• Would I rather choose jack-of-all-trades, master-of-none touring skis and save some money in the process?

That’s really up to you and your budget. If you decide on the former, the solution is simple: get a pair of skis designed for every snow condition or outing type you would see in the backcountry. If you decide on the latter, tailor your ski selection to the conditions you will most likely encounter in your local terrain. Being a die-hard backcountry skier, I went with three pairs of skis that are still tailored to the local terrain and mostly always powdery conditions of Rogers Pass:

• Ski-Mountaineering: Salomon MTN Explore 95 with pin bindings – light, fast, floppy
• Backcountry Powder Skiing: Atomic Backlands 109 with pin bindings – rather light, stiffer, directional, powder-charger
• Resort and Lift-Assisted Touring: Moment Wildcat 116 with SHIFT bindings – heavy, burly, playful-charger

For a description of binding types, see How To Choose Ski Touring Bindings: Clip In & Ski.

Choose A Waist Width For Your Touring Skis

We use several width measurements to describe a ski, notably the waist, shovel, and tail width, with the first being the most important. The waist of the ski is located right under your boot. It’s the first measurement I look at when I choose touring skis. To simplify the process, let’s divide the waist width into three categories.

Narrow (75-95mm): The narrow waist width prioritizes performance on hard snow/ice, low weight, and edge-to-edge transition. It’s ideal for ski-mountaineering on wind-scoured faces, narrow couloirs, and days when you’ll be chasing some big vertical. They excel in areas with typically low snowfall, such as the Rockies and the East Coast. Be wary, skis with a narrow waist are usually designed with other features (i.e. low weight, minimal tip rocker, and low stiffness) that accentuate their drawbacks, such as terrible high-speed stability and low flotation in deep snow.

Medium (95-115mm): The medium waist width strikes the perfect balance between hard and soft snow performance. While still manageable on hardpack, they provide just enough float in the deep stuff. Being a bit heavier, the stable platform will be a dream on the downhill, but you’ll feel the legs at the end of a big day

Fat (115-130mm): The “fat” waist width is the king of powder skiing and bottomless snow. The wide waist provides more float than a 300-lb skier would ever need. However, those skis are absolutely terrible on anything other than soft snow. Don’t even think twice about taking those babies on icy slopes. On hardpack, the large width makes the ski cumbersome during the edge-to-edge transition and requires more effort to initiate a turn. This is probably the last category to complete your quiver, as it is very specific to those ultra-rare bottomless powder days.

The shovel and tail width can be considered only after you’ve targeted a waist width category. They work in tandem with the waist to balance flotation in soft snow, turn initiation, and edge-to-edge transition.

Target A Weight Range For Your Touring Skis

When it comes to weight, I have a short saying: “Go as light as possible, but not too light”. In an ideal scenario, you would have the lightest ski to haul uphill and the burliest ski on the downhill. I’ve got some bad news for you… Light often equals soft and floppy at speeds. And, a soft, floppy ski is your worst enemy when bombing down a sweet backcountry run at Mach 4. High speeds naturally require a stiffer setup to dampen the increased vibrations. Depending on what use your ski will see, it’s important to stay within the following weight ranges for different applications.

I’ve certainly climbed to the high alpine on skis that would otherwise be better for sidecountry touring. It’s best to follow the above guidelines without obsessing over it. After all, what’s the point of having the lightest ski if you’re fearing for your life on the way down? Personally, I won’t mind hauling a beefy ski on the uptrack if it grants me the descent of a lifetime.

Select A Profile

When you look sideways at a ski, you’ll notice all kinds of curves. This is called the profile of the ski, essentially a side cross-sectional view of the ski. The profile directly affects how the ski will behave on snow. I’ve outlined four main profiles found on current models, although you’ll find a lot more variety out there.

Full Rocker: The full rocker profile, otherwise known as the reverse-camber or “banana” profile, provides maximum float in deep powder. On the flip side, they have a shortened effective edge, which renders them useless on hardpack and at high speeds. Additionally, climbing skins hardly ever stay secured to rockered skis and provide little traction on the uptrack due to their minimal contact with the snow. This profile is very specific to powder skiing and nothing else. I wouldn’t recommend it for touring.

Full Camber: The full camber profile is typically used in racing skis. It provides the longest effective edge and the best edge hold on hardpack snow. The profile also allows the ski to flex more when carving, granting it a lot more “pop” or rebound energy when edging. The lack of an early rise rocker means the profile will perform poorly in powdery conditions, whereas your tips will simply dive below the snow’s surface – either that or you force yourself to be the world’s most backseat skier.

Mustache Rocker: The mustache rocker profile, otherwise known as the rocker/camber/rocker profile, is the holy grail of shapes when it comes to ski touring. It strikes the perfect balance between a rockered and cambered ski. The tip and tail have an early-rise rocker profile for some float in powder, while the waist has a cambered profile for good traction and “pop” on hardpack. In this case, you get the best of both worlds. Most skis are designed in this way for good reasons. This is the profile I look for when I choose touring skis.

Neutral Camber: The neutral camber profile, otherwise known as flat profile, is hardly ever seen on the market. It’s not great or bad at anything. To be honest, I’m not sure why designers would target this profile.

A note on early rise rocker: watch out for floppy shovels (where the ski curls up). In an effort to reduce the ski’s swing weight, some manufacturers cut meat out of the shovels to a point where they vibrate excessively at speed. This turns your favourite super-G ski run into a horrifying experience.

Review The Laminate Construction

You should also choose touring skis based on how they are built. Originally, making a ski was a simple matter. Thin sheets of wood were cut to size, stacked, glued, and cured using a combination of hydraulic press and moulds. The process creates an arrangement of varying wood layers called the core laminate. In the last 15 years, advancements in laminate construction have resulted in the use of composites, namely carbon fibre and fibreglass. The end goal was and still is to reduce weight while maintaining performance at a low manufacturing cost. Nowadays, all skis are built with some form of carbon or fibreglass. I’ve summarized below the different types of core laminates found in 2024.

Pure Composite: The pure composite laminate uses composites such as carbon, aramid, or flax fibres exclusively to achieve the desired characteristics. Those skis are ultra-expensive and usually designed for the niche sport of “skimo” racing and professional ski-mountaineering competitions. They suck at anything other than climbing mountains on skis.

Hybrid: The hybrid laminate is where it’s at today. It involves metals, plastics, composites, and wood. It also provides the best balance between price tag, weight, and performance. It’s pretty rare not to find carbon stringers or honeycomb inserts laminated somewhere along the length of the ski.

Pure Wood: The pure wood laminate has one ingredient: wood. A favourite amongst old-schoolers, the feel of a wood-cored ski is simply unrivalled (according to them). The price tag is also usually much lower than its hybrid counterpart, but the ski’s weight may suffer.

A note on metal: manufacturers use an optimized blend of aluminum, zinc, magnesium, and copper called Titanal. A ski containing Titanal will most likely be damp, stiff, and heavy. Personally, I avoid Titanal skis for touring as they are simply way too heavy for my taste.

A note on foam skis: foam core skis are dominant amongst low-end models. Cheap, so so cheap. They will lose whatever little stiffness and rebound energy they have within a week. Avoid at all costs!

Verify The Tip and Tail Design Of Your Climbing Skins

The shape of the tip and tail of the ski is also important when choosing a pair of touring skis. You must double-check that the ski’s tip or tail will be compatible with the tip and tail hardware on your climbing skins. Some touring-specific ski models have a built-in notch at the tip and tail to secure the climbing skin.

Related: How To Choose Climbing Skins: Stick And Glide

Pick A Length For Your Touring Skis

All touring skis are offered in a variety of lengths. This is a hard one. Shorter skis, although lighter, provide less float and stability than longer ones. Since I’m not willing to compromise on downhill performance, I tend to size my touring skis like I size my resort skis. The increased confidence when skiing big lines is more than enough to justify the minor increase in weight. Shorter skis are more agile in a tight spot, such as when executing a kick-turn in bushy forest or navigating down a narrow chute.

It’s All About How It Feels On Snow

While you can obsess all you want about the numbers (as I do), it all boils down to choosing the touring skis that feel good. There’s no substitute for visiting your local gear store and renting demos for the day. I recommend trying out several pairs on the same day to get a comparative idea of how they perform in identical snow conditions. Ski resorts commonly host demo days where manufacturers lend their skis for free. Give it a shot! This is a golden opportunity to try out your dream skis.

Related Articles

– How To Choose Ski Touring Boots: Fit & Features
– How To Choose Ski Touring Bindings: Clip In & Ski
– How To Get Into Ski Touring (Backcountry Skiing)